I have been a long-term admirer of your work, even before you changed what the “C” in your name meant. It was very helpful of you and the DPP to publish a list of 72 films and the subsequent 39 that were prosecuted made then all the more necessary to get hold of and view. It has also been wonderful watching your scope increase; from film editors to analysing video games and now you have been allowed into the online world.
We shall skip what the definitions, legal or otherwise about what is pornography and pornographic, they have become a terms stripped of all meaning recently and I’ll just get to the nub of the matter.
I find the challenges of “regulating online pornography” to be rather easy.
What is made and filmed by consenting adults is legal and obviously anything made without consenting adults is a matter for the police, so this covers my view on the making of such material.
So we now have to turn our heads to who views such things and when it comes to viewing such material then it follows that it is legal for consenting adults to watch this material also.
If we skip the confusing laws of the UK that make the act of having sex legal at 16 but then having to be a full 2 years older to actually watch it legally then we should take the maximum age of 18 and below as the people we should worry about when it comes to getting hold of such material online.
And in this case it falls squarely on the parents.
I therefore can’t really expand to fill the requested word count of 1500 so I’ll just reiterate my main point;
Regulating online pornography to those under the legal age is the job of the parents or the adults responsible of said minors.
I feel I’ve just written myself out of a job but please feel free to consider me for the role.
Thanks for reading.